(253) 840-1100 ˇ (253) 838-5103
                  Fax: (253) 840-1199 ˇ Email: chirodoc@foxinternet.net

  Print This Page
  Search Tools
 Shopping Cart
   HOME | CONTACT US| STORE

 

In The News

 
Children & Chiropractic?


 

Teenagers Need Chiropractic More
A recent study of Swiss secondary schools discovered a very high lifetime and point prevalence of back pain in children ages 12 to 17: Lifetime prevalence of back pain -- 74% Lifetime prevalence of low back pain -- 51% Point prevalence of disabling low back pain -- 24.3% (Disabling low back pain is defined as having interfered with school work or leisure time).

Reference: Balague F, Skovron ML et al. Low back pain in school children: a study of familial and psychological factors. Spine, 1995, 20(11):1265-1270


Is Chiropractic Safe For My Child?

International Chiropractic Pediatric Association Newsletter
September/October 1997


Recently I was asked "What are the risks of chiropractic care for my child". I conducted an extensive medline search covering the years 1966-1997, using the terms "chiropractic" and "children", so that I may find reports of adverse events which may have occurred in children as a result of chiropractic care. In more than 31 years of medical literature I have only found one reported case of damage to a child as a result of chiropractic care and even this case is speculative at best.

According to this report a child with a rare spinal tumor presented to a chiropractor with reports of torticollis (Wry Neck). It is alleged by the author that tissue damage (necrosis) found in the area of the tumor, discovered during autopsy, was caused by 'chiropractic manipulation'. However, there exist no scientific proof that this damage was the result of a chiropractic adjustment. Speculation by this author is irresponsible. This particular tumor (an astrocytoma) has been commonly reported to be a congenital condition in numerous medical publications. Additionally the credentials of the person performing the manipulation are not discussed. While it may seem common sense that only chiropractors would be credited with making chiropractic adjustments, such is not the case.

Terrett has done an extensive review of literature, going back to 1934, and found that of 78 cases of vertebrobasilar stroke (none of which occurred in children) following 'chiropractic manipulation' 36% were not performed by chiropractors. You might then ask who is performing such manipulations, which are incorrectly being attributed to chiropractors? The answer is an Indian barber, a kung-fu practitioner, a blind masseur, medical doctors, nurses, osteopaths, physiotherapists, victim's wives', and persons doing self neck wrenching manipulation. I find that it is sad that such irresponsible reporting by so-called responsible medical researchers is printed and is misleading the public.

Estimates of risk of chiropractic adjustment are extremely low. I will use some figures to illustrate this point:


Chiropractic Care for the Child Athlete Joel Miller D.C., F.I.C.P.A
September/October 1998
International Chiropractic Pediatric Newsletter


There are some negative opinions in chiropractic regarding contact sports like boxing and football. Some of our colleagues feel these sports should be avoided. Whatever your particular opinion, these sports (pee-wee football, boxing and the like) have been around for decades and are here to stay. The sports chiropractor should not attempt to replace the medical staff already in place at any level of competition. However, it has been my experience that as chiropractors if we care for the athletes chiropractically and not attempt to interfere with or replace the trainers, medics or EMTS, our acceptance both on and off the field is much greater. Having been a team chiropractor for numerous athletic teams from professional baseball, wrestling, and boxing to the little league football and soccer levels, I'd like to share some information, as well as my experience, as such. Almost all organized levels of childrens sports have age and weight limitations. In some sports, such as martial arts, events not only have an age and weight requirement but they also have the children categorized (or matched) according to their skill level. Team chiropractors' should be aware of the proper use of safety equipment and proper fit of protective gear like football helmets, pads and sparring gear used in contact sports.

Injuries to children's spines are not unique to contact sports like football or martial arts. They are also seen in non-contact sports like gymnastics and competitive cheerleading. Injuries to the pediatric spine vary according to the specific mechanism of injury. Therefore, the pediatric sports chiropractors knowledge of particular sports is helpful in assessing the care he or she will render. Specific to the child athletes' spine one should have knowledge of the ossification centers. The primary centers at the vertebrae, or centrum, and the neural arch unite forming the vertebral arch. Fusion of the body with the posterior elements occurs as early as 3-6 years and as late as 16 years. The secondary centers of ossification, consisting of the two vertebral body end plates, the two transverse processes and the spinous process fuse between 14 and 25 years of age. Also the joints of Luschka are not fully formed until age 7. Additionally, some bones, such as the sacrum, do not fuse until well into the second decade of life, and thus may function as individual vertebrae depending on age.

Subluxations, fractures or failure of fusion of secondary ossification centers can result from head impacts as experienced in football or martial arts, or from falling on the child's feet or buttocks as in gymnastics or cheerleading. Development of the normal spinal curves will assist in dissipating compressive forces or loads. However, athletics may induce concussive forces the body cannot adapt to thus resulting in vertebral subluxation complexes.

The common area of injury from a head impact is the mid to lower cervical (C4-C6). The common area of injury from a forces from below, as in falling on the feet or buttocks, is T-9 - L2. Flexion injuries of the spine commonly affect the C4-C6, T5-6 and L1-L2. And one should always check the upper cervical spine. T. K. Videman, M.D. from the University of Helsinki in 1988 found that the slightest hypomobility in diarthrodial joints (facet joints) would cause joint degeneration in 5-7 days, which becomes irreversible in 2-3 weeks. Following 5 weeks of joint fixation, 18 months of care was required for optimal healing which was almost always incomplete. The sooner we as chiropractors can care for the child athlete, and correct his or her subluxation, the less likely they are to have life long patterns of ill health and who better than the chiropractor to care for these little athletes.

Caring for the children during an event should be discussed next. The team chiropractor should be able to assess the athlete's specific needs. Never disregard the need for a comprehensive chiropractic evaluation. And please, no public display of adjusting. (P.D.A.) Team chiropractors who will spend time working with children athlete should educate themselves regarding specialized training in the field of chiropractic pediatric adjusting techniques. That is not to say adjusting the child with bilateral supine, rotary breaks and lumbar roll both sides as is sometimes done on adults. Rather learn how to adjust children correctly through programs like ICPA's certification program, which Dr. Webster started and we are continuing to promote. When evaluating a child either on or off the field before applying a chiropractic adjustment, one should be able to objectively evaluate as many components of the vertebral subluxation complex as possible. The sports chiropractor needs to be aware of the functional uniqueness of the child's spine when doing so. For example, the normal range of motion in a child's spine is greater than that of an adult. This is important to know when assessing a child's spine. Also, as a team chiropractor for any sport, and any level, there will come a point in time when you are the only attending health care provider. It would be a good idea to know when you should transport via EMT in emergency situations. My experience is that no one will belittle you if you play it safe. One of our chiropractic colleagues from an opposing team thought he could tape a knee and get the star player back into the game only to learn later that the child had suffered a fractured fibula. As chiropractors, we must focus on the vertebral subluxations and the dangers of such especially those arising out of sports injuries. We should also educate the players, parents and coaches. Each year I hold a coach's clinic for all the area "Pop Warner" football coaches. This clinic is well attended because we bring in a certified athletic trainer to teach basic training and taping techniques. I also do a chiropractic health orientation and educate coaches and trainers on the cause and the harmful effects of subluxations. In my presentation, I use the Emmett Smith quote "playing in a football game is like being in 30-40 care accidents" and then I multiply that by the 10 games the kids have each season. I also use this opportunity to show them the benefit of chiropractic care for the athletes, both pre and post game. This clinic is held in my office so the coaches, parents and players have the opportunity to see it first hand. Whether the children are participating in contact or non-contact sports, a proper chiropractic evaluation by a qualified pediatric chiropractor can keep them in the game and help to minimize if not prevent injuries leading to vertebral subluxations. Dr. Joel Miller is professor of pediatrics at Life University, School of Chiropractic. He has been an I.C.P.A. member since 1990. Dr. Miller has served as a team chiropractor for the Minnesota Twins, the Boston Red Sox, WWF Wrestling, Florida State University atheltic teams and numerous childrens sports organizations. Dr. Miller is also a member of the I.C.P.A.'s distinguished speakers bureau and conducts seminars for the I.C.P.A.


Friday February 16 1:13 PM ET

Infants' Runny Nose May Cut Asthma Risk Later On
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - If your baby has a runny nose it may actually be a good thing, study results suggest. It seems that children who get such minor infections may be less likely to develop asthma later on in life.

The findings appear to support the theory that common infections shape the immature immune system in a way that cuts the risk of asthma and allergies later in life.

In a study of more than 1,300 children followed from birth to age 7, German researchers found that those who had two or more bouts of runny nose before age 1 were half as likely as other children to develop asthma later on. They were also less likely to have allergies by the age of 5.

Researchers led by Dr. Sabina Illi of University Children's Hospital in Munich report the findings in the February 17th issue of the British Medical Journal.

The airway inflammation that marks asthma is often caused by an abnormal immune reaction to environmental irritants such as pollen, dust and mold. . Previous studies have suggested that certain infections early in life may ward off asthma by pushing the developing immune system toward infection-fighting mode. This, the theory goes, may make children's immune systems less likely to overreact to normally benign environmental factors.
*ALL immune reactions work this wayEDr. Acosta


According to Illi's team, these new findings lend support to this idea. The investigators found that repeated ``mild infections''--runny nose or infection with a herpes virus--were linked to a lower risk of asthma and allergy. On the other hand, repeated infections of the lower respiratory tract, such as the flu or pneumonia, were associated with a higher asthma risk. This, the researchers report, suggests that children predisposed to asthma may be more vulnerable to such infections.

Over the past 20 years, asthma has become more and more prevalent worldwide. Some experts put part of the blame on the increasingly sterile conditions in which children are growing up. They point out that smaller families, fewer germs, and more antibiotics early in life may be shaping children's immune systems to overreact to normally harmless irritants.

*I find this interesting because in the last 20 years, our drug and prescription usage has increased to an all-time high. There is certainly no shortage of asthma medication in the U.S., and if we look at the numbers from other countries, you'll see that our efforts from a drug-philosophy are working against us. Remember, only the power that makes the body heals the body. Don't lose faith in your own immune and nerve systemEr. Acosta

SOURCE: British Medical Journal 2001;322:390-395


Wednesday February 14 10:49 AM ET

Safety of Supplements for Children Unclear
WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) - US researchers warned Tuesday that the safety and efficacy of many dietary supplements have not been tested in children, and said that parents should exercise caution when giving supplements to their kids.

``There's potential for harm (in children taking dietary supplements), especially considering that, as children, they're still growing and developing,'' Michelle Rusk, an attorney with the Federal Trade Commission's Division of Advertising Practices, said at a meeting with the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites).

Rusk was referring to young people, particularly adolescent boys, who take ``body-building'' supplements in an effort to build strength and muscles. ``Children may take steroid hormone supplements to emulate popular athletes,'' Rusk noted at the meeting.

For example, while products containing gamma butyrolactone are typically marketed for adults as performance enhancers, they can be very dangerous for children. ``Parents should not assume that that supplements work the same way in children as they do in adults,'' Rusk stressed.

``While the judicious use of dietary supplements can be viewed as a strategy for optimizing nutrition, it remains to be resolved who will and will not benefit from their use and under what circumstances,'' noted Dr. John Milner of the National Cancer Institute (news - web sites). Researchers can assess the ways in which a particular dietary supplement or nutrient may affect a certain child by looking at the child's genetic profile, dietary intake and a variety of environmental factors, Milner noted. But he warned that as with drug trials, the findings from dietary supplement studies will not be universally optimistic.

``I suspect we will find many supplements that will have a positive effect on one tissue and a negative effect on another tissue,'' Milner said. Scientific research is fast verifying a link between certain nutrients and health benefits, such as the benefits of fiber in lowering blood pressure or the connection between folate and the risk of developing colon cancer, Milner pointed out.

Yet without independent studies of the specific effects of those nutrients in children, that know-how remains incomplete, he added. ``We cannot assume that one size fits all,'' he said. The US Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites) (FDA) currently does not regulate dietary supplements as long as their makers market them not as treatments for a particular disease but rather to help maintain a ``structure or function'' of the body.

It remains unclear whether the rising concern over the use of dietary supplements in children will build a stronger case for the FDA's increased regulation over the products, Dr. Steven Hirschfeld, with the agency's Division of Oncology Drugs, told Reuters Health. ``I personally feel that it is not safe for people to take dietary supplements without more information,'' he said. The surest route to getting that information is ''regulation,'' Hirschfeld said. However, he cautioned that any eventual FDA regulation of dietary supplements should not ''impede marketing'' but serve as a means to guide their development in order to ``minimize risks.''

Friday February 9 1:20 PM ET

'Wait-And-See' Approach May Be Okay for Earache
By Merritt McKinney
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Waiting a few days to see whether symptoms of an ear infection improve before beginning a course of antibiotics appears to be a practical way to reduce the use of antibiotics, according to results of a UK study. This may help prevent the overuse of the drugs, and thus prevent bacteria from becoming resistant to antibiotics. And even though physicians often complain that that parents pressure them to prescribe antibiotics, most parents in the study were satisfied with a ``wait-and-see'' approach for treating the common ear infection otitis media.

``A wait-and-see approach in the management of acute otitis media is feasible and was acceptable to most parents, and resulted in a 76% reduction in the use of antibiotic prescriptions,'' according to Dr. Paul Little from the University of Southampton, UK, and colleagues. The authors report their findings in the February 10th issue of the British Medical Journal.

Each year millions of children are prescribed antibiotics to treat the middle ear infection, but the evidence that the drugs speed a child's recovery is mixed. Plus, antibiotics can cause side effects such as diarrhea, and widespread prescription of the drugs is thought to be increasing the risk that bacteria will become resistant to antibiotics.

In a study of 315 children aged 6 months to 10 years who had an acute ear infection, parents were randomly assigned to one of two treatment options. Some parents were given a prescription for antibiotics to be filled immediately. Others were also given a prescription, but were encouraged to wait 72 hours before using the medication, although they could begin them sooner. Parents were advised to begin antibiotics after 3 days if a child still had substantial ear pain or fever, or was not feeling any better. On average, children who took antibiotics immediately after seeing a doctor improved sooner than children who delayed treatment, the report indicates. Immediate treatment appeared to reduce by about one day the length of earache symptoms including discharge of fluids from the ear.

Children who started antibiotics sooner also cried less, woke up during the night less frequently and took slightly less paracetamol (acetaminophen, which is the active ingredient in Tylenol and other over-the-counter pain relievers). But the researchers point out that most of these improvements occurred more than 24 hours after the children started taking antibiotics, when the illness was already beginning to ``settle.'' And there was no significant difference in the reduction of pain or distress in either treatment group. Little's team also points out that a higher percentage of children who received immediate treatment developed diarrhea than children in the wait-and-see group, 19% versus 9%.

The team also notes that parents of children who were treated immediately were more likely to believe in the effectiveness of antibiotics for otitis media, , even though the infection can clear up on its own.This may encourage repeat visits for future ear infections, leading to even more antibiotic prescriptions, according to the authors.

Of course, it is difficult to fault parents who want to seek treatment for a child in pain, but Little told Reuters Health that parents can help a child without resorting to antibiotics. Little pointed out that most parents in the study did not use full doses of over-the-counter pain relievers. He encouraged parents to treat children's ear pain with adequate doses of paracetamol, ibuprofen or both, particularly at bedtime since pain often wakes children during the night.

SOURCE: British Medical Journal 2001;322:336-342.


Friday February 9 10:31 AM ET

Breath Holding Occurs Automatically in Some Kids NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - For some children, holding their breath until they turn blue or pass out is a way to manipulate parents or express their frustration. But for others it is an automatic reaction that may occur in babies as young as 6 months, study findings reveal. Such breath holding spells (BHS) typically begin with crying, followed by noiseless exhalation of breath, a change in skin color and a loss of consciousness.

According to a report in the February issue of Pediatrics, BHS occurs in 0.1% to 4.6% of healthy children and many cases of severe breath holding spells start at age 6 to 12 months, with 12% of cases occurring in younger children. One baby began to experience BHS within hours after birth. In this study, 95 children with BHS were followed for up to 9 years. About one third of the children were found to have a family history of BHS. The highest number of spells occurred between 13 to 18 months in boys and between 19 to 24 months in girls. About 30% of children had breath holding spells at least once a day but the average number of spells was one a week. Spells stopped between 37 and 42 months of age in most children but lasted as long as 7 years in others, the report indicates.

According to Dr. Francis J. DiMario, Jr., of the Connecticut Children's Medical Center in Hartford, the results can be used to develop treatments and to help parents deal with episodes. ``An important part of evaluating children with BHS is counseling their parents,'' DiMario writes. Knowing what to expect ''can allay some parental anxiety.''

Indeed, DiMario published a study last year showing that breath holding can cause severe stress in mothers. Stress caused mothers to view their child more negatively than mothers of children without medical conditions, that study revealed. ``Because the parent-child relationship is under stress, mothers of children with BHS...are at risk of developing dysfunctional parenting behaviors and/or their children are at risk of developing behavioral problems,'' the earlier study reported.

SOURCE: Pediatrics 2001;107:265-269.